Written by:

Asunción Leonard
In this post:
Fanz vs Alpogo (2025): Complete Comparison for Argentine Organizers

Choosing a ticketing service in Argentina is not just about selecting a technical tool; it involves defining your event's digital identity, determining the level of control you want over your business operation, and establishing how the buyer will experience the entire purchasing process. When an organizer searches on Google “Fanz vs Alpogo”, they are really evaluating which platform best suits their work model, brand strategy, and growth needs.
Fanz positions itself as a 100% white-label ticketing service, designed for sales to occur from your domain with your visual identity. Alpogo, on the other hand, operates as a centralized platform, where events coexist within a common ecosystem. Both models work, but they respond to different logics. This guide analyzes only real and active functionalities today, without mentioning roadmaps or future implementations, so you can make a solid decision based on verifiable operations.
Quick Summary: How do Fanz and Alpogo differ today?
The following table presents observable structural differences in practice, based on how each platform actually works today. It is the best starting point to understand the contrast between a white-label model and a marketplace model.
Feature | Fanz | Alpogo |
|---|---|---|
Yes. Sales from a 100% organizer-owned domain. | Sales within the platform, usually on subdomains. | |
Checkout, branding, emails, and design fully customized. | Customization available, but within the Alpogo ecosystem. | |
Payment Method | Direct integration with organizer’s Mercado Pago. | Internal platform processing. |
Data Ownership | 100% organizer-owned; no shared database. | Database managed within the platform’s ecosystem. |
Automation / Email Marketing | Integrated functions to automate communications. | Requires external tools. |
AI / Remarketing | Automatic functionalities active today. | The organizer manages these actions externally. |
24/7 Chatbot | Available as part of the digital ecosystem. | Not part of the standard system. |
Control Panel | Modern, modular, with real-time metrics. | Traditional panel. |
Mobile-first, consistent with the organizer's brand. | Standard market-responsive. | |
Data Sharing | 0% shared. Exclusive organizer's data. | Shared ecosystem. |
What are organizers really looking for when comparing Fanz vs Alpogo?

When an organizer evaluates ticketing alternatives, they are actually assessing operation models, not just specific functions. Every question they ask directly impacts conversion, brand perception, and the event’s growth potential.
✔ Domain and Brand Control
For a professional organizer, selling from an own domain is not a technical detail: it is a declaration of identity. When the buyer sees tickets.yourevent.com, they perceive professionalism, visual coherence, and trust. This reduces friction, improves the perception of security, and increases conversion.
Fanz allows the entire experience — landing, checkout, emails — to be built under the total branding of the organizer, with no visible references to the platform.
Alpogo, in contrast, offers customization, but always within the visual and structural environment of the platform. The event exists within the Alpogo ecosystem, not in a fully independent environment.
This difference is critical for producers building long-term brands, venues with solid identities, corporate events, or festivals seeking to consolidate digital authority.
✔ Payment Flow and Financial Operation
How payments are credited directly affects event management. In Fanz, payments are processed directly into the organizer's Mercado Pago account. This not only simplifies administration but also keeps the organizer in control of their financial operation, with visibility and tracking from a single platform.
In Alpogo, payment processing happens within its system. This represents a more centralized model, where the platform manages financial flows before releasing funds according to its commercial policies.
There are two distinct philosophies:
One prioritizes independence and control.
The other is based on an integrated and centrally managed model.
✔ Buyer Experience
In a country where more than 70% of ticket purchases are made from smartphones, mobile optimization is essential.
Fanz adopts a mobile-first approach: fluid design, simplified steps, and visual coherence with the organizer's brand. The user feels they are buying directly from the event, which increases trust.
Alpogo offers a standard responsive checkout, fully functional, adapted to different devices, but within the uniform aesthetics of the platform.
The difference lies in the impact on conversion: when the event's identity accompanies the entire process, escape points are reduced.
✔ Automation and AI
Many organizers do not have a dedicated marketing team or do not want to depend on multiple external tools.
Fanz incorporates real automation functionalities: email flows, automatic activations, and remarketing tools that work today. This allows maintaining active and coherent communication without relying on manual configurations in external tools.
In Alpogo, these features are not natively integrated, so the organizer must manage remarketing, emails, or activations from additional platforms.
✔ Total Data Control
The attendee database is one of the most important assets for an organizer.
Fanz guarantees that the data is 100% the event’s. They are neither shared nor mixed with others. You can export them whenever you want and use them for future campaigns, analysis, or CRM.
In Alpogo, data is managed within the centralized ecosystem. This does not prevent operation, but it does represent a different model in terms of ownership and strategic use.
In-depth Comparison: Fanz vs Alpogo
✔ Domain and Customization
Fanz: The organizer sells from a real own domain, configured through DNS, with SSL certificate, personalized checkout, and emails aligned to their identity.
Alpogo: Offers visual customization, but within the platform’s environment, without complete own domain.
✔ AI and Remarketing
Fanz: It has active remarketing functionalities based on real automation, integrated into the sales process.
Alpogo: Requires the organizer to manage remarketing from external tools.
✔ Conversion and Purchase Experience
Fanz: Prioritizes clarity, simplicity, and brand coherence throughout the process. The payment method is integrated directly to the organizer.
Alpogo: Offers a functional and responsive purchase process, within the visual style of the platform.
✔ Data and Analysis
Fanz: Modern panel with real-time metrics and complete data export, always organizer-owned.
Alpogo: Traditional panel within its centralized environment.
What Type of Organizer Chooses Each Platform?
Fanz is ideal for organizers who seek:
To have their own sales ecosystem.
To build or reinforce the event brand.
Total control of their data.
To automate tasks and optimize conversion.
A professional experience integrated with their identity.
Alpogo is often chosen by organizers who:
Prefer to operate within a centralized platform.
Want a standard solution without the need for an own domain.
Do not require total branding control at all stages.
Real Advantages of Fanz for Argentine Organizers
Real own domain
Complete white-label
Integrated email marketing
Active automation and remarketing today
0% shared database
Modern and scalable panel
Direct integration with Mercado Pago
24/7 Chatbot
Mobile-first experience aligned with the event's identity
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Fanz just a ticketing service?
Yes, Fanz is exclusively dedicated to ticket sales under a white-label model. This ensures total focus on the purchasing experience and the needs of a professional organizer.
Can I sell from my own domain?
Yes. Fanz implements it with the organizer's complete domain, not subdomains.
Does Alpogo allow complete own domain?
Not in the same way. Alpogo operates within its centralized platform.
Which platform integrates automation and AI?
Fanz has active features today. Alpogo relies on external tools.
Do I own my buyers' data?
In Fanz, yes: 100% yours, always exportable.
Conclusion
The choice between Fanz vs Alpogo depends on the type of operation you want to build. Fanz is designed for organizers who value own brand, own domain, total data control, and real automation. Alpogo fits well within a more traditional and centralized ticketing approach.
If your goal is to develop a solid identity, improve conversion, and have absolute control over your digital ecosystem, Fanz naturally aligns with that strategy.

